-

High ResolutionSo…does “charity” come in under “missions” or “other”? Looks like a pretty basic business model to me, minus the taxation of course. So why aren’t we taxing these places again?
I was going to say because they’d want official representation in the government. But they pretty much have that now, I suppose.
Show Notes
-
kinghedgehog reblogged this from hatefulatheist
-
churchfu reblogged this from divineirony
-
stopdropandbeauty reblogged this from hatefulatheist
-
mykael reblogged this from hatefulatheist
-
tessarose8 reblogged this from ablogorsomething
-
stainedsteel reblogged this from lynch-bait and added:
charity falls under ‘missions’ because, while aiming to get members, they are doing charitable things :U also falls...
-
doggiekisser reblogged this from ablogorsomething
-
cloudytranslucence reblogged this from preachers-wife and added:
i’ll agree with the preacher’s wife on this one. and the proposal of a non-physical or even mobile church could prove to...
-
cloudytranslucence liked this
-
squashedcomments reblogged this from preachers-wife and added:
Isn’t the budget of any non-profit with employees going to look a lot like this? (Except that most of them aren’t going...
-
justinmtartick reblogged this from divineirony
-
preachers-wife reblogged this from divineirony and added:
Half of churches have attendance of fewer than 100 people (average is about 185). Say your budget is under $100K...
-
delirium-trigger liked this
-
divineirony reblogged this from hatefulatheist and added:
say because they’d want official representation in...government. But they pretty much have...
-
theunspokenword reblogged this from hatefulatheist
-
alcarohtareseere reblogged this from religiousfails
-
religiousfails reblogged this from hatefulatheist
-
bylligoat reblogged this from babydali
-
necrossassin liked this
-
courtneyhammett reblogged this from simplyopinions
-
greghyatt reblogged this from hatefulatheist
-
shin8shin reblogged this from simplyopinions
-
qualapec reblogged this from connorivor and added:
It’s not that I don’t think some churches serve a valid, positive purpose in some people’s lives, but I do think they...
-
johnnieanonymous reblogged this from babydali
-
not-sama reblogged this from hatefulatheist
-
connorivor reblogged this from simplyopinions
-
kitudjamerre liked this
-
electricsimplicity liked this
-
electricsimplicity reblogged this from hatefulatheist
-
tarantulatom reblogged this from applespirate
-
echotangowhisky reblogged this from hatefulatheist
-
bowiechick liked this
-
phillyfishy liked this
-
bowiechick reblogged this from hatefulatheist
-
hyperdashsc2 reblogged this from metropolis09
-
you-me-rainbows reblogged this from montypla
-
montypla reblogged this from tenousei
-
trulybadtiming said:
Because if we tax them they have to be represented in government. Sure, they already lobby and have a huge influence and blah blah blah. But if we tax them then we LEGITIMIZE the influence they have on our government. Which is not what we want.
-
xbelievernow reblogged this from hatefulatheist
-
richardlc liked this
-
dangermann reblogged this from hatefulatheist
-
foreverliberal liked this
-
perse1010 liked this
-
simplyopinions reblogged this from randomaphobia and added:
fuck churches. I’m sorry but they’re creepy, abusive, brainwashing places. tax their shit.
-
iwannafuckversacehooker liked this
-
applespirate reblogged this from hatefulatheist
-
applespirate liked this
-
yourkillingfloor reblogged this from babydali and added:
yourkillingfloor: Because its the law? Churches no matter if they’re Christian or what do not get taxed, and I don’t...
-
huntsmanhounds liked this
-
28---06---42---12 liked this
- Show more notesLoading...