Divine Irony

is a rich archive of religious delusions, scientific truths and political implications.

"Tell people there’s an invisible man in the sky who created the universe, and the vast majority believe you. Tell them the paint is wet, and they have to touch it to be sure."

-George Carlin

“If people are good only because they fear punishment, and hope for reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed”.

-Albert Einstein

Pages

Filter Content /Tags

Twitter

Ask me anything

Archive

RSS

Theme
  1. christinsanity:

dendodge:

christinsanity:


Look USA, Canada is doing it right.


On an only slightly related note, I’ve always wondered why Americans have “In God We Trust” on their banknotes, ever since I noticed it in Miracle on 34th Street.
I thought y’all had some kind of separation of church and state thing, where the government was supposed to be all secular and shizz. (That’s my best attempt at US vernacular)


Generally speaking it is because of the Red Scare in the ’50s.  christinsanity:

dendodge:

christinsanity:


Look USA, Canada is doing it right.


On an only slightly related note, I’ve always wondered why Americans have “In God We Trust” on their banknotes, ever since I noticed it in Miracle on 34th Street.
I thought y’all had some kind of separation of church and state thing, where the government was supposed to be all secular and shizz. (That’s my best attempt at US vernacular)


Generally speaking it is because of the Red Scare in the ’50s. 
    High Resolution

    christinsanity:

    dendodge:

    christinsanity:

    Look USA, Canada is doing it right.

    On an only slightly related note, I’ve always wondered why Americans have “In God We Trust” on their banknotes, ever since I noticed it in Miracle on 34th Street.

    I thought y’all had some kind of separation of church and state thing, where the government was supposed to be all secular and shizz. (That’s my best attempt at US vernacular)

    Generally speaking it is because of the Red Scare in the ’50s. 

  2. smokingcraterofmymind:

55 years ago today, “IN GOD WE TRUST” was added to the currency of the United States. This driving force for this act was caused by the single worst motivating force known to man, fear.

“The Red Scare”, to be precise. smokingcraterofmymind:

55 years ago today, “IN GOD WE TRUST” was added to the currency of the United States. This driving force for this act was caused by the single worst motivating force known to man, fear.

“The Red Scare”, to be precise.
    High Resolution

    smokingcraterofmymind:

    55 years ago today, “IN GOD WE TRUST” was added to the currency of the United States. This driving force for this act was caused by the single worst motivating force known to man, fear.

    “The Red Scare”, to be precise.

    (via faithinirony)

  3. atheist-overdose:

My 95 year old great-grandfather, who is atheist, have this to my brother.  inside was a one dollar bill from 1935 and a ten dollar bill from 1950.

    atheist-overdose:

    My 95 year old great-grandfather, who is atheist, have this to my brother. inside was a one dollar bill from 1935 and a ten dollar bill from 1950.

  4. atheistoverdose:

Good guy canada. this is our new money.follow for the best atheist posts on tumblr
  5. atheistoverdose:

Helped with the designs for the original american currency. would be disgusted that it says “in god we trust” on the back of the $100 dollar bill that bares his portrait.

    atheistoverdose:

    Helped with the designs for the original american currency. would be disgusted that it says “in god we trust” on the back of the $100 dollar bill that bares his portrait.

    (via atheist-overdose)

  6. nonplussedbyreligion:

Posting without comment…

    nonplussedbyreligion:

    Posting without comment…

    (via stfueverything)

  7. “…and we put it right were Jesus would want, on our money.” -Bill Maher

    “…and we put it right were Jesus would want, on our money.” -Bill Maher

    (Source: mzdcuriosity, via contemplatingstardust)

  8. Trust fall! Trust fall!
    High Resolution

    Trust fall!

    (Source: coolatheist, via ummagumma-)

  9. christinsanity:

Empire’s religious downfall…

    christinsanity:

    Empire’s religious downfall…

  10. ih8religion:

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again… “I love Bill Maher!”
I H8 RELIGION

    ih8religion:

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again… “I love Bill Maher!”

    I H8 RELIGION

    (Source: faqueers)

  11. nonplussedbyreligion:

    I’m not sure if I ever talked about Atheist Oasis, but I love that blog.  This is the latest post and it just highlights why the guys over there were good resources when I was a “new” atheist.  ~ Kim

    *****

    In WHO Do We Trust, Exactly? More Nonsense From The Religious Right

    Recently, due to a bad run, I’ve had to move in with a friend while I scavenge at the bottom of the abysmal job market. And yes, he’s a Christian (and a creationist to boot), but he’s an old and dear friend. We assiduously avoid religious discussions (as they end in loud acrimony), but we co-exist, which is the way it should be. He’s thoroughly familiar with my position on religion long before he agreed to help me out.

    So Saturday morning, I’m awakened by his loud neighbors at 8 (why people feel the need to carry out conversations at the top of their lungs regardless of the hour, is beyond me. Nobody cares but them.), so I clamber off the inflatable bed in the corner and start cruising the channels (I didn’t have TV at the old apartment, so it’s kinda a treat), when I come across a listing on C-SPAN title ‘In God We Trust’. So I flip to it, with frighteningly predictable results. (see video)

    Mind you, this is just a taste of an hour-long waste of our taxpayer dollars. And they pulled out all the old (re)tired tropes. Here’s a smattering of the oldies-but-moldies:

    1. Our founding fathers created this country because of their belief in god.

    This is just a stupid argument: it’s an argument from tradition, and it relies on the deification of the founders as some sort of saintly GODSQUAD. The simplest counter? They also ‘believed’ in: slavery, leeches, that water was bad for them (a good percentage, likely 100, is that they were soused most of the time anyways), Benjamin Rush thought that being born non-white was a congenital defect (he also used to tie down patients on a board and spin them, to cure what I don’t recall), Washington wanted to be king, Hamilton was a raging asshole (Burr did us a favor there) – the litany goes on. The point is that they were wrong about a great deal of things. They were correct about many other things. Why? Because they were human beings. We could go over an exhaustive list of their flaws, but for the sake of brevity, I shall move on.

    2. The Declaration of Independence speaks of a ‘Divine Judge’, that every man is given their rights by their creator.

    This is by far one of the more obnoxious of the litany of tropes. The word ‘Creator’ is obviously deliberately left ambiguous.Why? Because some of the founders were Deists. I couldn’t tell you the demographics of the period, i.e., how many Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, or Muslims were extant at that time. Obviously there were some around. That one of the rethuglickans actually interpolated the word ‘divine judge’ in his nonsense was offensive as well as egregious. By modern standards, I can claim my rights derive from my parents, fer FSM’s sake. I illustrated in one of my essays from 2007 that five of the big founders would not be elected by neo-cons today.

    3. It’s on the walls, it’s on our currency, etc.

    The first time the ‘logo’ showed up was in 1864. I’m fairly sure that all the founders were deceased by then. So the founders argument flounders on this point, because that’s 88 years AFTER this country was founded. It didn’t even show up on our paper currency until 1964, which is 288 years after our inception. Republicans don’t fact-check. How is this not a surprise?

    The other issue is that our actual motto (until Eisenhower passed that law in 1956, due to McCarthyism and the Cold War) was E Pluribus Unum, which was actually approved by the founders, and means “Out of many, one“. Never mind the infamous Treaty of Tripoli, Article 11, which unequivocally states that, “As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion,—as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen,—and as the said States never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.” This was also passed unequivocally by the senate in 1797, and signed by the president (Article 11 included).

    (The argument usually used, is that this a sovereignty treaty, and therefore doesn’t apply. However, such treaties are as a rule represent the state of law in said country.)

    The Constitution nor the Bill of Rights state any of the key points of Christianity: there is no declaration of Jehovah or Yahweh (or whatever ‘name’ the Christian would provide); there is no declamation that “Jesus is our lord”; nor is there any mention of the alleged resurrection. Those are the big three points, any of which being present would prove that this is a ‘Christian nation’. Historically, the Christians were excessively intolerant of other faiths, ergo there would be no First Amendment statement tolerating any other religion.

    And the repercussions were ridiculous for the few who dissented.

    “Fox Nation’ immediately posted the names of the nine people who voted against Resolution 13. Keith Ellison, the only elected Muslim representative, voted ‘present’, and abstained. He spoke to it later, stating that “We’re out of our lane. We’re in their [The American People’s] private religious affairs, not doing what we’re supposed to be doing, which is getting the economy working.” (Good advice, I say.)

    The rest of the nonsense can be found here, if you have the stomach for it.

    What none of these pandering politicians get, is that the language is demonstrating an exclusivity in an inclusive society. When one stipulates “In God We Trust”, it is a clear violation of church and state: that in referring to “God”, it is clearly bent in favor of the Judeo-Christian deity: the Jews spell it “G_d”, the Muslims holler “ALLAH AKBAR”, the Hindus bring up Brahma, etc..

    The free pass is over, folks. Your two hundred years of domination is over. Time for a level playing field.

    Get used to it.

    Till the next post, then.

    (Source: atheistoasis.wordpress.com, via nonplussedbyreligion-deactivate)

  12. What’s God got to do with it?

    nonplussedbyreligion:

    He may be invoked in the national motto, but God has nothing to do with why Americans are free and secure.

    By Michael Shermer

    November 4, 2011

    The House voted 396-9 this week to reaffirm as the national motto the phrase “In God We Trust” and encouraged its pronouncement on public buildings and continued printing on the coin of the realm. The motto was made official in 1956 during the height of Cold War hysteria over godless communism and — in the words of Brig. Gen. Jack D. Ripper in “Dr. Strangelove” — “Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrination, Communist subversion and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.”

    As risible a reason as this was for knocking out a few bricks in the wall separating state and church, it was at least understandable in the context of the times. But today, what is the point of having this motto? There are no communist threats, and belief in God or a universal spirit among Americans is still holding strong at about 90%, according to a 2011 Gallup Poll. The answer is in the wording of the resolution voted on: “Whereas if religion and morality are taken out of the marketplace of ideas, the very freedom on which the United States was founded cannot be secured.”

    What is troubling — and should trouble any enlightened citizen of a modern nation such as ours — is the implication that in this age of science and technology, computers and cyberspace, and liberal democracies securing rights and freedoms for oppressed peoples all over the globe, that anyone could still hold to the belief that religion has a monopoly on morality and that the foundation of trust is based on engraving four words on brick and paper.

    If you think that God is watching over the U.S., please ask yourself why he glanced away during 9/11 or why he chose to abandon the good folks of New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina, and why he continues to allow earthquakes and cancers to strike down even blameless children. The problem of evil — why bad things happen to good people if an all-powerful and all-good God is in control of things — has haunted the faithful since it was first articulated millenniums ago, with nigh a solution on the horizon.

    It’s time to drop the God talk and face reality with a steely-eyed visage of the modern understanding of the origin of freedom on which the United States was founded and continues to be secured. God has nothing to do with it. If you want freedom and security, you need the following:

    The rule of law; property rights; a secure and trustworthy banking and monetary system; economic stability; a reliable infrastructure and the freedom to move about the country; freedom of the press; freedom of association; education for the masses; protection of civil liberties; a clean and safe environment; a robust military for protection of our liberties from attacks by other states; a potent police force for protection of our freedoms from attacks by people within the state; a viable legislative system for establishing fair and just laws; and an effective judicial system for the equitable enforcement of those fair and just laws.

    With these in place the citizens of a nation feel free and secure. Why? The answer is in the final word of the motto: Trust. Claremont Graduate University economist Paul Zak has studied trust among nations and found that the more of these components that are in place, the more citizens trust one another. Zak even computed the differences in living standards that trust can affect, demonstrating that a 15% increase in the proportion of people in a country who think others are trustworthy raises income per person by 1% per year for every year thereafter. For example, increasing levels of trust in the U.S. from its current 36% to 51% would raise the average income for every man, woman and child in the country by $400 per year. Trust pays.

    Trust has fiscal benefits that are derived through specific political and economic policies that have nothing whatsoever to do with religion or belief in God. Despite a strong faith in God, the percentage of Americans who believe that “religion can answer all or most of today’s problems” has plummeted from 82% to 58%, while those who believe that “religion is old-fashioned and out of date” leaped from 7% to 28%, according to a 2010 Gallup Poll. Thus it would seem that Americans are more aware today than half a century ago that it’s up to us to secure our freedom through enlightened secular policies with practical social applications rather than faith-based hope in empty mottoes reflecting an era gone by.

    Michael Shermer is the publisher of Skeptic magazine, a monthly columnist for Scientific American and an adjunct professor at Chapman University and Claremont Graduate University. His latest book is “The Believing Brain.”

    (Source: Los Angeles Times, via nonplussedbyreligion-deactivate)